️Oil and Gas Subcommittee
• Shahid Ahmad
• Saleem Zulfiqar
• Dr Gulfraz Ahmad
• Dr Shahid K. Haq
• Karim Mahmood
• Ahmad Masood
• Zahid Muzaffar
This subcommittee played a key role in developing the legal and commercial arrangements for fuel supplies to IPPs, including natural gas and imported furnace oil.
In addition to the formal members of the Task Force, technical experts such as Shamsul Mulk, then Member Power and later Chairman of WAPDA, and Pervez Butt, former Chairman of KANUPP and the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), provided advice on power sector matters.
The Chairman of the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) worked on the framework for customs duty and income tax concessions for IPPs. Mian Mumtaz Abdullah, Chairman of the Corporate Law Authority (CLA), contributed to the legal arrangements for the registration of foreign companies and contracts incorporating dollar indexation.
Taken together, these measures brought technical planning, financial structuring, taxation, and corporate regulation into a single investor friendly framework built largely around imported fuel based power generation.
🔘 Government and Private Sector Participation
The composition of the Task Force shows that it brought together senior government officials, representatives of public sector institutions, and members of some of Pakistan’s largest private business groups. The government and the private sector were therefore both directly involved in formulating the 1994 Power Policy.
This raises an important question because representatives of certain business groups involved in the policy making process were later associated with investments in power projects and Independent Power Producers (IPPs).
When individuals involved in drafting a policy, or the business groups they represent, subsequently derive financial benefits from that policy, serious questions of potential conflict of interest may arise.
The central issue is whether the policy was designed exclusively to address Pakistan’s national energy requirements or whether its structure also provided particular advantages to certain commercial interests. In economic and governance literature, such situations may be examined through the concepts of regulatory capture and the revolving door. However, whether either concept applies in this case can only be established through credible documentary evidence.
The Private Sector Participation Sub Committee, for example, was chaired by Dr Abdul Razak Dawood, who was then Managing Director of Descon Engineering. Representatives of the Saigol Group and the Crescent Group also served on the same committee.
One significant example is Mian Azam Saigol, who participated in the policy making process. His business group later established Kohinoor Energy, an IPP developed under the 1994 Power Policy. This raises a legitimate question as to whether some of those involved in shaping the policy subsequently became its commercial beneficiaries.
Dr Abdul Razak Dawood was included in the Task Force as a representative of Pakistan’s private industrial and engineering sector. Descon’s core business, however, included the engineering, procurement, and construction of power plants and other industrial projects. In the years that followed, Descon secured engineering, procurement and construction (EPC), operation, and maintenance contracts in the power sector. In 2006, it also acquired Altern Energy, an IPP originally established under the 1994 Power Policy. These developments similarly raise questions about a potential conflict of interest.
A related concern is the movement of public officials into private companies after leaving government service, commonly described as the revolving door phenomenon. It refers to situations in which individuals who were involved in formulating, regulating, or implementing a public policy later join private companies that benefit from that same policy.
Several individuals associated with the Task Force were later linked to private power companies. For example, a study published by the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) associates Shahid Hasan Khan, Chairman of the Task Force, with the US based energy company AES, and Salman Faruqui, a senior government official, with Uch Power.
However, the exact nature, duration, and scope of these associations remain unclear. Before drawing any firm conclusions, I intend to seek Shahid Hasan Khan’s response on whether he, or any other individuals associated with the Task Force, subsequently held positions in or maintained professional relationships with private power companies and, if so, in what capacity.
For context, AES was a US based energy company that developed two IPPs in Pakistan, Lal Pir Power and Pak Gen Power. In 2010, both plants were acquired by a Pakistani consortium led by Mian Muhammad Mansha’s Nishat Group and subsequently became part of the group’s power portfolio.
[To be continued in the next episode.]
Very informative